Volume- 4
Issue- 4
Year- 2017
DOI: 10.21276/ijirem.2017.4.4.11 |
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.21276/ijirem.2017.4.4.11
Crossref
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Jehad bani hani , Hussain A. H. Awad
Lists and indicators that determine the order of countries and organizations have been spread in recent years according to the strength of innovation they have. These indicators and measurements have varied from one side to the other; which in turn create a high desire by the managers to identify and select the best and most appropriate standards by which to measure the level of innovation in their organizations. From this point of view, the purpose of this study is to establish a base on innovation standards in business and to clarify the extent of awareness of Saudi IT managers by the concepts of innovation and its standards in the business sector. To achieve this purpose, this study aims at proposing a preliminary list of Innovation measurements in the Saudi health sector ranking its importance from the study sample's viewpoints. The concept of innovation has been initially identified at this study and been distinguished from the concept of creativity. Moreover, some global indicators that measure innovation in the countries, organizations, and companies have been identified. Finally, the key findings of this study show that there are significant differences distinguish innovation measures from each according to the respondents’ viewpoints. The study recommended that Saudi private hospitals should adapt innovation strategy, which supports its strategic position.
1. AMUE, KENNETH. (2012). New product development and consumer innovative behavior an empirical validation study. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 97-109, Available online: http://www.ejbss.com/recent.aspx
2. Carney & Ryan. (2010) Measuring firm level innovation: review of the literature & survey-design, final version.
3. Ettlie, John. (1983). Organizational policy and Innovation Among Suppliers to the Food Processing Sector, Academy of Management Journal, 26(1).
4. European Research and Innovation Area Board (ERIAB). (2012). 1st Position paper of the European
5. GE Global Innovation Barometer (2016). A Perspective on the State of Innovation in 2016 from Senior Business Executives in 13 Countries, the GE GIB, Available online: http://www.gereports.com/innovation-barometer-2016/
6. Gupta (2014) Global Innovation Science Handbook 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill Education Canada
7. IBM Melbourne Institute (2010). Innovation Index of Australian Industry. Available online: http://www03.ibm.com/press/au/en/presskit/24599.wss
8. McKinsey Global Survey (2008). Assessing innovation metrics. The McKinsey Quarterly. Available online: http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes
9. Musa, Iman, Waleed. (2012). Antecedents And Consequences Of Market Orientation In Public Sector In The Kingdom Of Bahrain. International Conference on Business, Economics, Management and Behavioral Sciences (ICBEMBS'2012) Jan. 7-8, Dubai pp. 499-505
10. Myles. (2012). 7 Sources Of Innovation By Peter Drucker. Posted by Myles Penniman on September 17, 2012. Available online: http://mylesclarku.blogspot.com/2012/09/7-sources-ofinnovation-by-peter-drucker.html
11. OREGON (2016). Innovation Index developed by Business Oregon’s Economic Strategies & Policy Division in partnership with the Innovation & Entrepreneurship Division, Available online: http://www.oregon4biz.com/assets/reports/InnoIndex2016. pdf
12. Oslo Manual (2005). Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, (3ed ed.), Available online: www.oecd.org/sti/oslomanual
13. Oyerogba, Olaleye, Solomon. (2014). Cost Management Practices and Firm’s Performance of Manufacturing Organizations. International Journal of Economics and Finance; Vol. 6, No. 6. doi:10.5539/ijef.v6n6p234. Available online:: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n6p234
14. Peter, Jonathan, Gavin. (2014). Innovation Index 2014. NESTA Working Paper. Issued: August 2014. Available online: http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/innovationindex-2014
15. Porter Michael. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Press.
16. Research and Innovation Area Board (ERIAB): "Stresstest" of the Innovation Union. Available online:http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovationunion/pdf/expertgroups/eriab_1st_position_paper__stresstest_iu.pdf
17. Sirkin, Andrew, Michael, & Knut (2007). Innovation 2007: A BCG Senior Management Survey, Available online: http://www.bcg.com
18. Souitaris, Vangelis (2011). Firm–specific competencies determining technological innovation: A survey in Greece, R & D Management, 32(1), pp. 61-77
19. Soumitra Dutta, Bruno Lanvin, and Sacha WunschVincent, (2016) The Global Innovation Index 2016 Winning with Global Innovation, Available online: www.globalinnovationindex.org.
20. Sekaran, Uma, Roger J. Bougie,(2016) Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach, 7th Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Associate Professor, Faculty of Business – Khulais, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, KSA
No. of Downloads: 4 | No. of Views: 703
T. Srajan Kumar , V. Indrani , D. Swaroopa .
July 2020 - Vol 7, Issue 4
Dr. K. R. Subramanian .
May 2020 - Vol 7, Issue 3
Mr. Vallabh R Pathak , Dr. Daniel Penkar, Mr. Shripad Shouche , Mr. Vinod Hange .
November 2018 - Vol 5, Issue 6