Volume- 11
Issue- 4
Year- 2024
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2024.11.4.13 | DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2024.11.4.13 Crossref
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Sanjaya Kunwar , Deepak Thapa
This study investigates the applicability of draft IS 1893:2023 for the seismic design of RC buildings in Nepal, focusing on the base shear coefficients for ‘Zone VI’ bordering Nepal on three sides. Key changes in the code are highlighted that control the design base shear coefficient. One of them is the shift from Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (DSHA) to Probabilistic Earthquake Hazard Assessment (PEHA), which has significantly increased the seismic zone factor. Other changes include updated site classifications, the introduction of serviceability checks, reformed acceleration response spectra, and the provision of minimum design horizontal base shear. The base shear coefficients were obtained using IS 1893:2023 for zone VI for different variations of site categories, structural systems, and importance classes. The obtained coefficients from the code were then compared with the existing NBC 105:2020 and IS 1893:2016 under the fundamental periods. Overall, the base shear coefficients from the IS 1893:2023 (SD) code were found to be the highest in all scenarios followed by the NBC 105:2020 (ULS). Significant margins in the coefficients were seen between these two for the RC SMRF buildings. However, for the dual systems - RC shear wall & RC SMRF buildings, narrow margins were seen. The study reveals implementing IS 1893:2023 in Nepal (Zone VI) would notably increase the base shear, resulting in a potentially more earthquake-resistant design, but also higher construction costs.
[1] D. R. Thapa, T. Xiaxin, G. Wang, and F. Fan, "Deterministic seismic hazard assessment for Nepal," in 16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017, Santiago, Chile, 2017.Available from : https://www.wcee.nicee.org/wcee/article/16WCEE/WCEE2017-730.pdf
[2] H. Chaulagain, D. Gautam, and H. Rodrigues, "Revisiting major historical earthquakes in Nepal: Overview of 1833, 1934, 1980, 1988, 2011, and 2015 seismic events," in Impacts and Insights of the Gorkha Earthquake, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 1-17. Available from : https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812808-4.00001-8
[3] "UNICEF Nepal Humanitarian Situation Report No. 3 (Earthquake): 20 November 2023," 2023. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/nepal/unicef-nepal-humanitarian-situation-report-no-3-earthquake-20-november-2023
[4] A. Tamrakar and S. Chen, "Comparison of the seismic design code for buildings of Nepal with the Chinese, European and American seismic design codes," in The Thirtieth KKHTCNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, Taiwan, 2017. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321133131
[5] D. Chamlagain et al., "Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Nepal for revision of National Building Code (NBC)-105," in 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 17WCEE, Sendai, Japan, 2020. Available from: https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/items/b35ca5da-de58-4e79-8dd0-c9dc0e59f815
[6] J. K. Shrestha et al., "Impact of revised code NBC105 on assessment and design of low rise reinforced concrete buildings in Nepal," Journal of Institute of Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-5, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3126/jie.v16i1.36527
[7] P. Giri, A. D. Bhatt, D. Gautam, and H. Chaulagain, "Comparison between the seismic codes of Nepal, India, Japan, and EU," Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018. Available from : https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0102-8
[8] Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision) IS 1893, 2016.
[9] Nepal National Building Code, Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal (NBC) 105, 2020.
[10] R. Banjara, D. Thapa, T. B. Katuwal, and S. Adhikari, "Seismic behaviour of buildings as per NBC 105:1994, NBC 105:2020 and IS 1893:2016", 10th IOE Graduate Conference, vol. 10, pp. 1461-1471, 2021. Available from: http://conference.ioe.edu.np/ioegc10/papers/ioegc-10-188-10246.pdf
[11] D. Adhikari, S. Adhikari, and D. Thapa, "A comparative study on seismic analysis of National Building Code of Nepal, India, Bangladesh and China," Open Access Library Journal, vol. 9, no. e8933, pp. 1-11, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108933
[12] M. Pokhrel et al., "Comparative seismic analysis, design, and cost estimation of a residential building," International Journal on Engineering Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27-36, 2023. Available from : https://doi.org/10.3126/injet.v1i1.60897
[13] B. Adhikari and A. Poudel, "Comparative study of building response on adoption of NBC105: 2020 and IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016," Indian Journal of Structure Engineering (IJSE), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 14-21, 2023. Available from: http://doi.org/10.54105/ijse.C4006.053123
[14] A. Sapkota, B. Sapkota, P. Jhabindra, and S. Giri, "Comparative study on the seismic performance of a typical low rise building in Nepal using different seismic codes," Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2024. Available from : https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01053-5
[15] Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions [Seventh Revision of IS 1893 (Part 1)], 2023.
[16] Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 2 Buildings [Seventh Revision of IS 1893 (Part 1)], 2023.
[17] D. Shah, "Comprehensive analysis of modifications in the draft code IS1893 (WC) 2023 for RC buildings," International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 11, no. 05, pp. 663-676, 2024. Available from: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V11/i5/IRJET-V11I595.pdf
[18] R. Leslie and N. Subramanian, "Impact of draft IS 1893-2023 code provisions on building design," High Rise Structures, pp. 24-30, 2023. Available from : https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rahul-Leslie/publication/377019120_Impact_of_Draft_IS_1893-2023_Code_Provisions_on_Building_Design/links/659243cb3c472d2e8ea358da/Impact-of-Draft-IS-1893-2023-Code-Provisions-on-Building-Design.pdf
[19] B. H. Seed, R. Murarka, J. Lysmer, and I. M. Idriss, "Relationships between maximum acceleration, maximum velocity, distance from source and local site conditions for moderately strong earthquakes," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 66, pp. 1323-1342, 1976. Available from : https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0660041323
[20] V. N. Khose, Y. Singh, and D. H. Lang, "A comparative study of design base shear for RC buildings in selected seismic design codes," Earthquake Spectra, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1047-1070, 2012. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000057
[21] Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures ASCE/SEI 7-16, 2017.
[22] Applied Technology Council, Seismic Response Modification Factors, Redwood City, California, 1995.
M.Sc. Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Pashchimanchal Campus, IoE, Tribhuvan University, Nepal
No. of Downloads: 16 | No. of Views: 600
Mohammad Aejaz Mir, Ashish Kumar.
October 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 5
Raber Hasan, Mehmet Ishak YUCE.
August 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 4
Ayse Yeter GÜNAL, Kadir Basar.
August 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 4