Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Multi Storey RCC Building with Mass Irregularities Using NBC 105:2020  and IS 1893:2002

Mahesh Dhital; Richika Rathore

doi:10.55524/ijirem.2022.9.5.21

Abstract

Today there is increasing population and demand of housing is increasing day by day, because of which multi storied buildings are constructed. These buildings are vulnerable to earthquake because of non-uniform distribution of loads as well as no uniform stiffness in building. As the form of building depends upon the requirements of the client the building may be subjected to the mass irregularity as well as stiffness irregularity. The building which have mass irregularity and stiffness irregularity must be safe during earthquake .Building should be able to withstand the earthquake force and should perform better when earthquake hit that building.In Nepal both IS code and NBC is use for analyzing the building for its performance against earthquake. Because of similar topography of India and Nepal. Nepal allow the use of IS code as well as its own code for the seismic analysis of structure. In Nepal new code is implemented removing the defects of old NBC 1994. In Nepal now NBC 105:2020 is followed for analysis of building. Nepal is located in earthquake prone zone seismic performance of building must be done for the design of any building within its territory. Hence, for the optimum performance of building regarding seismic performance, it has been seen that designers undertake the design considering both IS Code and NBC code. Here, we study the performance of building comparing Nepal building code with that of IS 1893:2002. In this thesis regular building G+7 with plan area 15mX15m is taken for the analysis and beam and column size are taken constant. The building is analyzed using ETABS 2016. Comparison is made for the displacement,drift,store shear, storey stiffness and base reaction.

Keywords

Base shear; Storey Shear; Seismic Analysis; Storey Drift

References

ATC-40-(1996)” Seismic Analysis and Retrofit of concrete Buildings”, vol. I, Applied Technology Council, Rewood City, CA, USA.
Cruz, E.F. & Chopra, A. K. (1986) “Elastic earthquake response of building frames”. Journal of structural Engineering.112 (3):443-459.
Valmundsson, E. V., & Nau, J. M. (1997). Seismic response of building frames with vertical structural irregularities. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(1), 30-41.
Valmundson, E.V. & Nau, J.M. (1997) “Seismic response of building frames with vertical structural irregularities”. Journal of Structural Engineering. 123(1):30-41.
Yang, P., Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Lai, M. (2000). A Study on Improvement of Push-over Analysis [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 1, 007
Han-Seon Lee1 and Dong-Woo Ko2 (2004)- RC building structures of torsion and additionally delicate storey at base storey,31,353-378.
Chintanapakdee, C. & Chopra, A. K. (2004) “Seismic response of vertically irregular frames: Response history and modal pushover analysis”. Journal of structural Engineering.130 (8):1177-1185.
Chopra, A. K. & Goel G. K. (2004) “A model push over analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetrical-plan buildings”. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.33:903-927.
MacRae, G. A., Kimura, Y. and Roeder, C.W. (2004) “Effect of column stiffness on braced frame seismic behavior”. Journal of Structural Engineering. 130 (3):381-391.
Tremblay, R., & Ponclet, L. (2005) “Seismic performance of concentrically braced steel frames in multistory buildings with mass irregularity”. Journal of structural Engineering.131(9):1363-1375.
Michalis, F., Vamvatsikos, D. and Monolis, P. (2006) “Evaluation of influence of vertical irregularities on seismic performance of a nine-storey steel frame”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 35: 1489-1509.
Devesh P. Soni., & Bharat B. Mistry., (2006)- explains the seismic response of vertically irregular building, 43(4),121-132.
Sadashiva, V., McRae G.A., & Deam D.L. (2008). Vertical and horizontal regularity provisions, 42(4), 288-301.
Le-Trung, K., Lee, K., & Lee, D. H. (2008)-Seismic Behavior and Evaluation of Steel SMF Buildings with Vertical Irregularities. In 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, China.
Sarkar, P., Prasad, A. M., & Menon, D. (2010). Vertical geometric irregularity in stepped building frames. Engineering Structures, 32(8), 2175-2182
Varadharajan, S., Sehgal V.K., & Babita Saini (2012)-Seismic response of multistory reinforced concrete frame with vertical mass and stiffness irregularities, 23(5), 362-389.

Cites this article as

M. Dhital, R. Rathore, "Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Multi Storey RCC Building with Mass Irregularities Using NBC 105:2020 and IS 1893:2002", International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIREM), Vol-9, Issue-5, Page No-151-158, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2022.9.5.21

Corresponding Author

Mahesh Dhital

M. Tech Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgrah, Punjab, India

Download Full Paper

Download PDF

No. of Downloads: 23 | No. of Views: 795

-->

Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Multi Storey RCC Building with Mass Irregularities Using NBC 105:2020 and IS 1893:2002

Citations

Download Full Paper PDF

Total View 795

Total Download 23