Volume- 9
Issue- 2
Year- 2022
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2022.9.2.47 | DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2022.9.2.47
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Zarana Dharmesh Patel , Ashish Nagar
In the oil and gas business, flow assurance is a relatively recent word. Flow assurance refers to a low-cost method of producing and transporting fluids from a reservoir to a processing facility. The growing demand of energy has led oil companies to move towards explora tion in offshore deep water sand remote places, under extreme environmental conditions. Owing to such harsh environmental conditions, oil companies have to face critical operational challenges during production and transportation of crude oil. One of such menace is flow assurance issues. Stream confirmation issues contrarily affect well consummation plan and creation working procedures. Hydrates, wax affidavit, naphthenates, asphaltenes, consumption, scales, slugging, and emulsion are all stream confirmation challenges. For stream confirmation, hydrates and wax testimony are basic difficulties that should be tended to first. This paper portrays the stream confirmation challenges that impact unrefined petroleum transportation from the repository to the retail location, both coastal and seaward, in chilly environments. The paper also represents the process mechanism and mitigation methods used for each fluid flow assurance issue. It is impossible to overstate the significance of flow assurance in the oil as well as gas business. Failure of flow assurance can result in catastrophic consequences, such as the loss of resources or even lives.
[1] M. Ballesteros Martínez, E. Pereyra, and N. Ratkovich, “CFD study and experimental validation of low liquid-loading flow assurance in oil and gas transport: studying the effect of fluid properties and operating conditions on flow variables,” Heliyon, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05705.
[2] G. Shi, S. Song, B. Shi, J. Gong, and D. Chen, “A new transient model for hydrate slurry flow in oil-dominated flowlines,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108003.
[3] Y. Liu et al., “Investigation of Hydrate Agglomeration and Plugging Mechanism in Low-Wax-Content Water-in-Oil Emulsion Systems,” Energy and Fuels, 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01323.
[4] M. Wise, A. Chapoy, and R. Burgass, “Solubility Measurement and Modeling of Methane in Methanol and Ethanol Aqueous Solutions,” J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.6b00296.
[5] J. Yang, S. Ji, R. Li, W. Qin, and Y. Lu, “Advances of nanotechnologies in oil and gas industries,” Energy Explor. Exploit., 2015, doi: 10.1260/0144-5987.33.5.639.
[6] T. A. L. Guedes, A. R. Secchi, P. A. Melo, and R. G. D. Teixeira, “Pipeline design with flow assurance constraints in offshore production lines,” Brazilian J. Chem. Eng., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s43153-020-00042-w.
[7] F. C. Jacomel, T. H. Sirino, M. A. Marcelino Neto, D. Bertoldi, and R. E. M. Morales, “Loss of Methanol and Monoethylene Glycol in VLE and LLE: Prediction of Hydrate Inhibitor Partition,” J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.9b00312.
[8] B. T. Bastian, J. N, S. K. Ranjith, and C. V. Jiji, “Visual inspection and characterization of external corrosion in pipelines using deep neural network,” NDT E Int., 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102134.
[9] H. R. Vanaei, A. Eslami, and A. Egbewande, “A review on pipeline corrosion, in-line inspection (ILI), and corrosion growth rate models,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.11.007.
[10] Q. Wang, M. Ai, W. Shi, Y. Lyu, and W. Yu, “Study on corrosion mechanism and its influencing factors of a short distance intermittent crude oil transmission and distribution pipeline,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104892.
[11] W. Zhao, T. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Qiao, and Z. Wang, “Corrosion failure mechanism of associated gas transmission pipeline,” Materials (Basel)., 2018, doi: 10.3390/ma11101935.
[12] D. Danninger et al., “Stretchable Polymerized High Internal Phase Emulsion Separators for High Performance Soft Batteries,” Adv. Energy Mater., 2020, doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000467.
[13] S. A. Solovyev, O. V. Solovyeva, R. R. Yafizov, S. I. Ponikarov, and I. Y. Portnov, “Study of the Influence of Coalescence Baffle Inclination Angle on the Intensity of Water-Oil Emulsion Separation in a Separator Section,” Chem. Pet. Eng., 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10556-021-00888-y.
[14] O. V. Solov’eva, S. A. Solov’ev, R. R. Yafizov, S. I. Ponikarov, and I. Y. Portnov, “Influence of Design of Baffles in a Gravity-Dynamic Separator Model on Water-Oil Emulsion Separation Efficiency,” Chem. Pet. Eng., 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10556-021-00857-5.
[15] C. J. Backi, S. Emebu, S. Skogestad, and B. A. Grimes, “A simple modeling approach to control emulsion layers in gravity separators,” in Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 2019.
[16] S. Huangal, J. L. Cieza, and A. Gil, “Electrostatic separation of a glycerine emulsion in biodiesel with application of various voltages and distances between electrodes,” Inf. Tecnol., 2019, doi: 10.4067/S0718-07642019000500231.
Reseacrh Scholar, Department of Chemistry, PIAS, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
No. of Downloads: 26 | No. of Views: 904
Dipankar Pradhan, Debasish Mondal.
October 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 5
Th John Lerphangam Monsang.
August 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 4
Afina Hasya, Sukiman.
June 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 3