International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering and Management
Year: 2016, Volume: 3, Issue: 4
First page : ( 339) Last page : ( 348)
Online ISSN : 2350-0557.
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Yevgeny Deryugin* , Natalya Narkevich , Natalya Antipina
A new method is proposed to determine fracture toughness of structural materials according to the test data of non-standard small-size chevron-notched specimens. The analytical expressions are obtained being based and derived from the constitutive equations of engineering fracture mechanics to determine the crack-driving force (specific fracture energy) and the stress intensity factor. There are no empirical constants and phenomenological dependencies in the calculations. The method allows us to exclude the periodic unloading of the specimen applied. All necessary calculation parameters are determined according to the experimental data. The method allows us to use the low-power test machines and does not require large amounts of material for the production of specimens, as well as fatigue precracking. The method allows us to certify fracture toughness of the material without restrictions regarding the amount of plastic deformation and in front of the crack tip and in the specimen as a whole. The examples are given to calculate the fracture toughness criteria for a number of structural materials characterized by the ability to plastic deformation and by the Young’s modulus value. The compliance of the calculated fracture toughness characteristics with test data of standard methods is observed.
[1] ASTM Designation E 399-09: Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness KIC of Metallic Materials. PA, USA: West Conshohocken, 2009.
[2] GOST 25.506-85. 1985. Methods of mechanical testing of metals. Determination of fracture toughness characteristics under static loading, Moscow: Izdatelstvo standartov.
[3] GOST 4647-80 (STSEV 1491-79) Moscow: IPK Izdatelstvo standartov, 1998.
[4] Leis, B.N. 2013. The Charpy impact test and its applications. Journal of Pipeline Engineering. 12 (3), 183- 198.
[5] Kren, A.P. and Rudnitskiy, V.A. 2008. Use of energy approach to determine fracture toughness of polymethyl methacrylate by indentation. Industrial Laboratory. Diagnostics of Materials. 74 (12), 55-57.
[6] Glezer, A.M., Permyakova, I.E., and Fedorov, V.A. 2006. Crack resistance and plasticity of amorphous alloys at microindentation. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Physical Series. 70 (9), 1396-1400.
[7] Barker, L.M. 1979. Theory for determining KIc from small, non-LEFM specimens, supported by experiments on aluminum. Int. J. of Fracture. 16 (6), 515-536.
[8] Wang, C.T. and Pillar, R.M. 1989. Short-rod elastic-plastic fracture toughness test using miniature specimens. J. Mater. Sci. 24, 2391-2400.
[9] Grant, T.J., Weber, L., and Mortensen, A. 2000. Plasticity in Chevron-notch fracture toughness testing, Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 67, 263-276.
[10] Drozdovskiy, B.A., Polischuk, T.V. and Volkov, V.P. 1987. Chevron notch as a method of thickness decrease of the specimen at determining of КIc value. Zavodskaya Laboratoriya. 6, 74-76.
[11] Rakhimkulov, R.R. 2010. Matching of fracture toughness values of К1Ñ, obtained in chevron-notched specimens and based on standard technique for a steel St3sp. Neftegazovoedelo. 2, 1-10.
[12] Hertzberg, R.W. 1989. Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials. 3rd ed., New York Wiley.
[13] Matvienko, Yu.G. 2006. Models and criteria of fracture mechanics, Moscow: FIZMATLIT,.
[14] Broek, D. 1974. Elementary engineering fracture mechanics, Leyden.
[15] Timoshenko, S.P. and Goodier, J.N. 1951. Theory of Elasticity, New York, Toronto, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
[16] Salem, J.A., Shannon, J.I., and Jenkins, M.G. 1992. Some Observation in Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Testing with Chevron-Notched Specimens. In K.R. Brown and F.I. Baratta (eds). Chevron-Notche Fructure. Test Experience Metals and Non-Metals. ASTM STP 1172, American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, 9-25.
[17] Barker, L.M. 1977. A simplified method for measuring plane strain fracture toughness. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 9, 361-369.
[18] Ruggieri, C. and Mathias, L. 2013. Fracture-resistance testing of pipeline girth welds using bend and tensile fracture specimens, Journal of Pipeline Engineering, 12 (3), 217-227.
[19] Roy, H., Ray, A., Barat, K., Hochmuth, C., Sivaprasad, S., Tarafder, S., Glatzel, U., and Ray, K.K. 2013. Structural variations ahead of crack tip during monotonic and cyclic fracture tests of AISI 304LN stainless steel. Materials Science & Engineering A. 561, 88–99.
[20] Bartisch, M., Zang, Z.F., Scheu, C., Rühle, M., and Messerschmidt, U. 2004. Fracture parameters of chevronnotched Al2O3/Nb sandwich specimens. Z. Metallkd. 95, 779-784.
[21] Deryugin, E.E. 1998. Improved model of the Griffith crack. J. of Appl. Mechanics and Technical Physics, 39 (6), 934-942.
[22] Zherebtsov, S.V., Salishchev, G.A., Galeyev, R.M., Valiakhmetov, O.R., Mironov, S.Yu., and Semiatin, S.L. 2004. Production of submicrocrystalline structure in large scale Ti-6Al-4V billet by warm severe deformation processing, Scripta Materialia. 51, 1147–1151.
[23] Physical Quantities. Reference Book. 1991. Edited by I.S. Grigor’ev, B.Z. Meilikhova. Energoatomizdat, Moscow, Russia.
[24] Titanium Alloys. Composition, structure, properties. 2009. Reference Book. Moscow, VILS-MATI,.
[25] Deryugin, E.E. and Suvorov, B.I. 2012. Defining the Fracture Toughness for Small-sized Samples of Materials with Submicrostructure, Vestnik SamGU. Technicalsciences. 4 (36), 123-129.
[26] Prokopovich, K.A. 2011. Static fracture toughness of the extraterrestrial Fe-17%Ni alloy. In Works of XII International Scientific and technical Ural school-seminar of metallographers-young metal science scientists. Ekaterinburg: UrFU, 288-290.
[27] Safarov, I.M., Sergeev, S.N., Korznikov, A.V., Galeyev, R.M., and Gladkovsky, S.V. 2013. Fibrous Ultrafinegrained Structure and Properties of Rolled Low carbon Steel 12 GBA. Letter on Materials. 3, 3-6.
The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences/ Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science, Tomsk, Russia,
No. of Downloads: 13 | No. of Views: 1862