Volume- 8
Issue- 6
Year- 2021
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.92 | DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.92
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Dr. Anubhav Soni
In this article we evaluate the ecological impressions of carbon capture and use (CCU) and carbon capture and storage (CCS) of technologies. To this end research on the assessment of the life cycle from the different literatures has been addressed. There are a total of 27 reports, 11 on CCS and 16 on CCU. CCS research has shown that power plants will reduce their global warming potential (GWP) from 63 to 82 percent, with combustion of oxygen fuel in pulverized coal and integrated combined cycle gasification (IPCG) plants to the greatest reduction and post-combustion capture in combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants, achieving the least reductions. CCS has higher environmental impacts than without acidification and human toxicity. The GWP for CCU varies greatly depending on how it is used. Mineral carbonation will decrease GWP by 4% to 48% compared to no CCU. In addition, compared to conventional DMC techniques, under CO2 lowers the GWP by 4.3 times and ozone depletion by 13 times for chemical extraction.
[1] Beal CM, Archibald I, Huntley ME, Greene CH, Johnson ZI. Integrating Algae with Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage (ABECCS) Increases Sustainability. Earth’s Futur. 2018;
[2] Gibbins J, Chalmers H. Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy. 2008;
[3] Bui M, Adjiman CS, Bardow A, Anthony EJ, Boston A, Brown S, et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy and Environmental Science. 2018.
[4] Kelektsoglou K. Carbon capture and storage: A review of mineral storage of CO2 in Greece. Sustain. 2018;
[5] Fridahl M, Lehtveer M. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2018;
[6] Vaughan NE, Gough C, Mander S, Littleton EW, Welfle A, Gernaat DEHJ, et al. Evaluating the use of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage in low emission scenarios. Environ Res Lett. 2018;
[7] Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A. Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. Journal of CO2 Utilization. 2015.
[8] Pires JCM, Martins FG, Alvim-Ferraz MCM, Simões M. Recent developments on carbon capture and storage: An overview. Chem Eng Res Des. 2011;
[9] Muratori M, Calvin K, Wise M, Kyle P, Edmonds J. Global economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Environ Res Lett. 2016;
[10] Verdon JP, Stork AL. Carbon capture and storage, geomechanics and induced seismic activity. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2016;
SOMC, Sanskriti University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India (anubhavs.somc@sanskriti.edu.in0
No. of Downloads: 24 | No. of Views: 769
Mr. Pooran Singh, Dr. Jitendra .
November 2021 - Vol 8, Issue 6
Gandhimathi. K, Yogarani. A , Sr. J. Arockia Jaya, Ponmathi. M .
March 2017 - Vol 4, Issue 2
Akshaya Priya s , Jenifer M , Keerthana M , Prasanna Kumar R.
January 2017 - Vol 4, Issue 1