Volume- 9
Issue- 5
Year- 2022
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2022.9.5.46 |
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2022.9.5.46
Crossref
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Akash Tandon , Dr. Rohit P Shabran
The Indian Constitution's Directive Principles of State Policy are outlined in Part IV. However these standards are rules and are not enforceable in that frame of mind of regulation anyway they are crucial in the administration of the country. Article 44 of the Constitution, which mandates the state to enact a uniform civil code, provides one such directive principle. Different headings have been given by the Zenith Court for its execution notwithstanding, because of exorbitant politicization in our country it is as yet a far off dream. Personal matters like marriage, divorce, and adoption are not governed by a single body of law. Different individual regulations are relevant to various strict networks who dwell in our country. These regulations find their source and authority in their strict texts and customs which accommodates orientation prejudicial practices in all structures and frequently is one-sided towards guys than that of females. This paper targets accomplishing a harmony between Right to Opportunity of Religion and Right to Correspondence by isolating the 'fundamental strict practices' and 'mainstream exercises'. In this manner one can say that the need of great importance is to sanction a Uniform Common Code however that should be done gradually and continuously in the wake of making individuals particularly the minorities, mindful about its degree and degree as well as their freedoms.
[1] http://india.wikia.com/wiki/Uniform_civil_code
[2] http://www.clearias.com/uniform-civil-code-ucc
[3] http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp / articleshow?msid=98057,
[4] F. Agnes, “Hindu Men Monogamy and Uniform Civil Code” XXX (50) Economic and Political.
[5] Weekly 32 (1995); B. Karat, “Uniformity v. Equality” Frontline 17 Nov, 1995.
[6] Rajeev Dhawan, “The Apex Court and Personal Law” The Hindu, 14 March 1997
[7] Nilanjana Bhaduri Jha, “Does India really need a Uniform Civil Code?” from website of Times of India, visited on 12.04.2017 20:03 PM IST
[8] Paras Diwan and Peeyushi Diwan,; Law of Marriage and Divorce, 47 (Lexis Nexis, Gurgaon 1997 edition).
[9] Shiv Sahai Singh, ; Unification of Divorce Laws in India, 376 (Lexis Nexis Gurgaon 1993edition ).
[10] Virender Kumar, “See the Rift, not the Fault” 12, The Tribune, 21 May, 2006.
[11] Ramesh Chander Nagpal, Modern Hindu Law, 182 (2008 Butterworths Wadhwa Publications, Nagpur)
[12] 217th Indian Law Commission Report was forwarded on 30 March 2009.
[13] B.M Gandhi, Hindu Law 376 (Eastern Book Company, Lucknow,4th edition,2016)
[14] Jyoti Rattan, “Uniform Civil Code in India: A Binding Obligation Under International And Domestic Law” 46 JILI 577 (2004).
[15] Muslim Personal Law: Clearing The Cobwebs, The Hindu, July 30, 2006.
[16] Shabana Azmi, Women, Stand Up For Your Rights, The Times of India, 7 July 2005
Research Scholar, Department of Law, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
No. of Downloads: 16 | No. of Views: 216
Dr G B Sabari Rajan.
April 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 2
Dr. R Nalini, Sreelakshmi.
April 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 2
Dr. R. Nalini , S. Yuvasri .
April 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 2