A Comparison of Sequential Extraction Methods for Used to Determine Exchangeable Cations (Ca,MgNa,K) of Erzurum Plain Agricultural Soils

Nesrin YILDIZ; TÃ¼lay DÄ°ZÄ°KISA

doi:10.21276/ijirem.2017.4.6.3

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to studiedsuitablity of sequential extraction method for determining exchangeable cations (Ca,Mg,K and Na) in Erzurum plain agriculture soils. The purpose of also thiswas aimed investigation to exchangeable cation status of Erzurum plain soils was as well as to determine find out suitability of different extraction methods (NH40Ac extraction method and sequential extraction method) for the availability exchangeable cations (Ca,Mg,K,Na)in Erzurum region soils. Representative 19 of soils samples were collected from different soil locations of Erzurum. In order to select the most suitable chemical method as related to exchangeable cations content of the test plant (potato) was taken as the standart (biological) index. The results of this study showed that plant available Ca,Mg,K,Na obtained with sequentaly extraction step 2 exchangeable K and step.6 exchangeable Na residual chemical exraction methods were interrelated (p<0.05) with K and Na content of potato leaf (biological index) for Erzurum Plain soils.

Keywords

Availability,Soil-exchangeable cationstests , NH40Ac and SequentialyExtraction Methods,Correlation, Biological indexes

Reference

[1] Baker, A. V. and Pilbeam, D. J., 2007. Handbook of Plant Nutrition.CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 334872742.

[2] Beckett P.H.T., 1964. Studies on soil potassium. II. The ‘immediate’ Q/I relations of labile potassium in the soil. J. Soil Sci. 15:9–23

[3]Benton.Jr., 2012. Plant Nutrition and Soil Fertility Manual, Second Edition. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group.6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300. Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. CRC. Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business

[4] Chen, Y. 1975. Environ. Len., IO, 129-158 k.~C. Stover, L. E. Sommers, and D. J. Silviera, J.1976. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 48, 2165-2175 [5] Chester R. ,and M. J. Hughes, 1967.Chem. Geol., 2, 249- 262

[6] Carrie, L., 2008. Soil testing and Plant analysis. Dept. Of Soil Science. U.V-Madison.

[7] Cheng,Yuan, C.,Hung-Lung, C.,Zhao-Ji, S. and ChuFang, W., 2005. A sequential extraction method mesaures the toxic metal content in fly ash form a municipal solid waste incineratör. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, 52, 921-926

[8] DizikÄ±sa, T., YÄ±ldÄ±z N., 2016a. EstÄ±matÄ±on Of NutrÄ±tÄ±onal Status Of Potato Solanum Tuberosum L Plant By SoÄ±l And Leaf Analyses Grown In PasÄ±nler Town PlaÄ±n of Erzurum. EI: Engineering Index International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering& Management (IJIREM) 6, 2349-2058 234 -238

[9] DizikÄ±sa, T., YÄ±ldÄ±z, N., 2016b. EstÄ±matÄ±on of NutrÄ±tÄ±onal Status of Potato Solanum Tuberosum L Plant by SoÄ±l and Leaf Analyses Grown in Oltu Town of Erzurum EI: Engineering Index International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIREM) 6, 2349-2058, 234- 238

[10] Forsee Jr. W.T. 1942. Development and evaluation of methods for the determination of phosphorus in Everglades peat under various conditions of treatment. Soil Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc. 4:50–54, 1942.

[11] Heckendorn, S., 2007. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Virginia Cooperative Extension.

[12] Jackson, M. L., 1962. Soil Chemical Analysis. PrenticeHall. Inc. Cliffs, USA

[13] Jenne. E. A. 1968. "Trace Inorganics in Water", A&. Chem. Ser. 73, 337-387

[14] Melsted S.W., T.R. Peck. 1973. The principles of soil testing. In: L.M. Walsh, J.D. Beaton, eds. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Revised edition, Madison, Wis.: Soil Science Society of America, Inc.,1973, pp. 13–21.

[15] Morgan.M.F.1941 Chemical Soil Diagnosis by the Universal Soil Testing System. New Haven: Connecticut Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 450, 1941, pp. 579–628. F.S. Watanabe, S.R. Olsen.1962. Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in water extracts of soils. Soil Sci. 93:183–188, 1962.

[16] Possek,H. S. F. J. Anderson, and W. J. Weber, Jr.,1968 Environ. Sci. Technol.,12, 1087-1093 .

[17] Van Der WeijdenC. H.,H. L. Arnoldus, and C. J. Meurs. Neth. J.1977.Sea Res., 11, 130-145 S. K. Gupta and K.

[18] Perkc.R. M.1974. Research Report No. 32, Water Resources Research Center,The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn.

[19] Peck .T.R., S.W. Melsted.1973. Field sampling for soil testing. In: L.M. Walsh, J.D. Beaton, eds. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Revised edition, Madison, Wis.: Soil Science Society of America, Inc., 1973, pp. 67–75.

[20] Peck .T.R., S.W. Melsted.1973. Field sampling for soil testing. In: L.M. Walsh, J.D. Beaton, eds. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Revised edition, Madison, Wis.: Soil Science Society of America, Inc., 1973, pp. 67–75.

[21] Tessier, A., Campbell, P. and Bisson, M., 1979.Sequential extraction procedure fort he speciation of particulate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51: 844-851.

[22] YÄ±ldÄ±z, N., Canbolat M. Y. ve Aydemir O., 1999. Erzurum Daphan OvasÄ± TopraklarÄ±nÄ±n Bitkiye yarayÄ±ÅŸlÄ± Azot Durumunun DeÄŸerlendirilmesi. GAP. I. TarÄ±m Kongresi. 1043-1049, ÅžanlÄ±urfa.

[23] YÄ±ldÄ±z, N., Güler, E., Bilgin, N., Kahraman, F., AkkuÅŸ, F., Er, G. ve DiyarbakÄ±rlÄ±, S., 2010. Erzurum OvasÄ± TopraklarÄ±nÄ±n Kalsiyum, Magnezyum ve Molibden Durumunun Neubauer Fide Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. 5. Bitki Besleme ve Gübre Kongresi. 15-17 Eylül. Ege Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. Özel SayÄ±. ISSN: 1018-8851., 447-452, Ä°zmir.

[24] YÄ±ldÄ±z, N ve Güler E., 2010a. Erzurum OvasÄ± TarÄ±m TopraklarÄ±nÄ±n Bitkiye YarayÄ±ÅŸlÄ± Bor Durumunun Uygun Ekstraksiyon Yöntemleri Seçilerek DeÄŸerlendirilmesi. 5. Bitki Besleme ve Gübre Kongresi. 15-17 Eylül. Ege Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. Özel SayÄ±. ISSN: 1018-8851., 458-464. Ä°zmir.

[25] YÄ±ldÄ±z, N ve Güler E., 2010b. Erzurum OvasÄ± TarÄ±m TopraklarÄ±nÄ±n Bitkiye YarayÄ±ÅŸlÄ± Bor Durumunun Uygun Ekstraksiyon Yöntemleri Seçilerek DeÄŸerlendirilmesi. 5. Bitki Besleme ve Gübre Kongresi. 15-17 Eylül. Ege Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. Özel SayÄ±. ISSN: 1018-8851., 458-464. Ä°zmir.

[26] YÄ±ldÄ±z, N., Bilgin N. ve Aksu E., 2003. Erzurum-Daphan OvasÄ± topraklarÄ±nÄ±n fosfor durumunun deÄŸerlendirilmesi. GAP.III. TarÄ±m Kongresi. 2-3 Ekim, 583-587, ÅžanlÄ±urfa.

[27] YÄ±ldÄ±z, N., and DizikÄ±sa, T., 2016. EstÄ±matÄ±on Of NutrÄ±tÄ±onal Status Of Potato Solanum Tuberosum L Plant By SoÄ±l And Leaf Analyses Grown In Erzurum Center EI: Engineering Index International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIREM) , 3/2350-0557 241- 245.

[28] YÄ±ldÄ±z, N., Bilgin, N. ve Barik, K., 2008. Determination of plant available nitrogen of Erzurum plain soils SCIExpanded AsÄ±an Journal of ChemÄ±stry 4, 3049 -3056.

[29]YÄ±ldÄ±z.N and T.DizikÄ±sa. 2017.A Comparison of Different Soil Phosphorus ExtractionMethods for Used to Determine Plant Available Soil Phosphorus of Erzurum Plain Agricultural Soils.International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIREM)ISSN: 2350-0557, Volume-4, Issue-3, May201

Cites this article as

N. YILDIZ, T. D. , "A Comparison of Sequential Extraction Methods for Used to Determine Exchangeable Cations (Ca,MgNa,K) of Erzurum Plain Agricultural Soils", International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIREM), Vol-4, Issue-6, Page No-761-767, 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21276/ijirem.2017.4.6.3