Volume- 8
Issue- 6
Year- 2021
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.209 | DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.209
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Dr. Garima Singh , Suhail Ahetesham, Anjali Jindal
Small and medium-sized businesses predominate Indian businesses. Such enterprises have become less sophisticated throughout overall supply chain management skills as opposed to major organizations because of their smaller size, the restricted scope of activities, and scarce resources. Families own and manage the majority of (Small and Medium Enterprises) SMEs. Owners make strategic decisions, oversee but also manage operations, as well as their attitude toward development, risk tolerance, as well as the degree of professionalism all, have a significant influence on the organization. English based-law origins as well as the court system modeled after the United Kingdom, Indian enterprises confront poor investor protection in practice, as well as organizations riddled with corruption and mismanagement. The much more significant example of external finance is unconventional finance, which includes funding from all nonbank, nonmarket sources but is often supported by non-legal procedures. Bank loans are the world's second-largest producer of foreign finance. Firms that have access the banking as well as market funding just don't have greater economic performance. It will be particularly intriguing to see how non-legal processes and alternative finance channels might help sustain development in situations when legalized institutions are ineffectual and marketplaces, as well as banks, remained undeveloped.
[1] R. Chaurey, “Labor regulations and contract labor use: Evidence from Indian firms,” J. Dev. Econ., 2015.
[2] S. Khanderia and S. Peari, “Party autonomy in the choice of law under Indian and Australian private international law: some reciprocal lessons,” Commonw. Law Bull., 2020.
[3] N. Nuggehalli, “Contract formation in India: Law and practice,” in Studies in the Contract Laws of Asia II: Formation and Third Party Beneficiaries, 2018.
[4] S. Khanderia, “Practice does not make perfect: Rethinking the doctrine of ‘the proper law of the contract’–A case for the Indian courts,” J. Priv. Int. Law, 2020.
[5] P. MacMahon, “Conflict and contract law,” Oxf. J. Leg. Stud., 2018.
[6] A. Savelyev, “Contract law 2.0: ‘Smart’ contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law,” Inf. Commun. Technol. Law, 2017.
[7] L.-C. Wolff, “The relationship between contract law and property law,” Common Law World Rev., 2020.
[8] M. K. Woebbeking, “The impact of smart contracts on traditional concepts of contract law,” J. Intellect. Prop. Inf. Technol. E-Commerce Law, 2019.
[9] M. Durovic, “Harmonization of contract law in eastern and south-eastern Asia: What can be learned from the cisg and the ecl experience?,” Glob. J. Comp. Law, 2018.
[10] O. O. Cherednychenko, “Fundamental Rights, Contract Law and Transactional Justice,” Eur. Rev. Contract Law, 2021.
[11] J. Rohr, “Smart contracts in traditional contract law, or: The law of the vending machine,” Clevel. State Law Rev., 2019.
[12] J. Wagner et al., “International Economics: Theory and Policy, Global Edition,” Eur. Econ. Rev., 2001.
[13] S. Verma, “Electronic government procurement: a legal perspective on the Indian situation,” Electron. Gov., 2004.
[14] M. Rajeev, “Contract labour act in India: a pragmatic view,” Int. J. Econ. Policy Emerg. Econ., 2010.
[15] V. Holubieva, L. Nevara, S. Savchuk, A. Detiuk, and V. Tatsiienko, “International experience on the improvement of national management technology and legal regulation of public contracts,” Rev. la Univ. del Zulia, 2021.
[16] R. K. Singh, “Adjudicating the Public-Private Law Divide: The Case of Government Contracts in India,” Verfassung R. und Übersee, 2017.
[17] M. P. Ram Mohan, P. Murugavelu, G. Ray, and K. Parakh, “The doctrine of frustration under section 56 of the Indian Contract Act,” Indian Law Rev., 2020.
Assistant Professor, Department of Management Science, Tecnia Institute of Advanced Studies, Delhi, India (drgarimadhankhar@gmail.com)
No. of Downloads: 38 | No. of Views: 897
Dipankar Pradhan, Debasish Mondal.
October 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 5
Th John Lerphangam Monsang.
August 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 4
Afina Hasya, Sukiman.
June 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 3