Volume- 8
Issue- 6
Year- 2021
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.105 | DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.105
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Dr. Nitin Thapar
For companies' creative talents and outcomes, effective search and convergence of internal and external knowledge becomes more and more crucial. In order for companies to reach this objective, they participate in numerous open innovation connections to create and capture value in multi-stakeholder situations. Due to the contradictory position of essential information, difficulties might give rise to a transparency paradox. It explores the idea of a paradox in a paradox, which is found in the paradox of openness. We integrate a viewpoint of knowledge and develop a mathematical model that reveals crucial ways to control these pressures to the other direction through innovative information uncertainty. This unsafeness exacerbates the tensions of transference by complexing information transfer and integration across organisational borders and alleviating the possibility of tackling these key conflicts of information by defining differentiating and consolidating processes to promote simultaneous sharing of knowledge while reducing the risk of disclosure.
[1] Foss NJ, Lyngsie J, Zahra SA. The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation. Strateg Manag J. 2013;34(12):1453–71.
[2] Chesbrough H, Lettl C, Ritter T. Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation. J Prod Innov Manag. 2018;35(6):930–8.
[3] Fernandez AS, Chiambaretto P. Managing tensions related to information in coopetition. Ind Mark Manag. 2016;53:66–76.
[4] Dhanaraj C, Parkhe A. Orchestrating innovation networks. Vol. 31, Academy of Management Review. 2006. p. 659–69.
[5] Al-Aali AY, Teece DJ. Towards the (strategic) management of intellectual property: Retrospective and prospective. Calif Manage Rev. 2013;55(4):15–30.
[6] Arrow KJ. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention”, in Universities-National Bureau (Ed.). Rate Dir Inven Act Econ Soc Factors , Natl Bur Econ Res Princeton,. 1962;609–26.
[7] Laursen K, Salter AJ. The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Res Policy. 2014;43(5):867–78.
[8] Dubey G, Rana A, Shukla NK. User reviews data analysis using opinion mining on web. In: 2015 1st International Conference on Futuristic Trends in Computational Analysis and Knowledge Management, ABLAZE 2015. 2015.
[9] Chhabra M, Gudi SK, Rashid M, Rohit, Sharma P, Sharma S, et al. Assessment of Knowledge on Risk Factors, Warning Signs, and Early Treatment Approaches of Stroke among Community Adults in North India: A Telephone Interview Survey. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019;
[10] Frishammar J, Ericsson K, Patel PC. The dark side of knowledge transfer: Exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects. Technovation. 2015;41:75–88.
[11] Schad J, Lewis MW, Raisch S, Smith WK. Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward. Acad Manag Ann. 2016;10(1):5–64.
[12] Ahmad A, Khan MU, Srikanth AB, Kumar B, Singh NK, Trivedi N, et al. Evaluation of knowledge, attitude and practice about self-medication among rural and urban north Indian population. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2015;
[13] Esty BC, Sesia A. An Overview of Project Finance & Infrastructure Finance---2006 Update. Harvard Busines Sch. 2007;Case No. 2.
[14] Aas TH, Pedersen PE, Abramovici M, Bancel-Charensol L, Agarwal R, Selen W, et al. From the Editor. Serv Ind J. 2015;
[15] Cox TH, Lobel SA, McLeod PL. Effects of Ethnic Group Cultural Differences on Cooperative and Competitive Behavior On a Group Task. Acad Manag J. 1991;34(4):827–47.
[16] Adler NJ. International dimensions of organizational behavior. Int Exec. 1986;28(1):31–2.
[17] Franco Modigliani; Merton H. Miller. The cost of capital, corporation finance and theory of investment. J Craniomandib Disord. 1958;5(1):19–27.
[18] Kumar N, Singh A, Sharma DK, Kishore K. Novel Target Sites for Drug Screening: A Special Reference to Cancer, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Parkinson’s Disease. Curr Signal Transduct Ther. 2018;
[19] Iyer M, Tiwari S, Renu K, Pasha MY, Pandit S, Singh B, et al. Environmental survival of SARS-CoV-2 – A solid waste perspective. Environ Res. 2021;
[20] Goswami G, Goswami PK. Artificial Intelligence based PV-Fed Shunt Active Power Filter for IOT Applications. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.
[21] Saraswat M, Tripathi RC. Cloud Computing: Analysis of Top 5 CSPs in SaaS, PaaS and IaaS Platforms. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.
[22] Khatri M, Kumar A. Stability Inspection of Isolated Hydro Power Plant with Cuttlefish Algorithm. In: 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application, DASA 2020. 2020.
[23] Sharma K, Goswami L. RFID based Smart Railway Pantograph Control in a Different Phase of Power Line. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications, ICIRCA 2020. 2020.
RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India Email Id- nitinthapar@rimt.ac.in
No. of Downloads: 21 | No. of Views: 769
Abrar Ishaq.
February 2023 - Vol 10, Issue 1