Volume- 3
Issue- 4
Year- 2016
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Tülay DİZİKISA , Nesrin YILDIZ
This study was conducted to determine the fertility potential of potato grown soils in Pasinler Town region of Erzurum cityto achive this a total of 42 soil (was performed to determine soil texture, lime content, soil pH, total salt, soil organic matter content ,cation exchange capacity (CEC) and macro and micronutrient concentrations) and leaf samples were collected (macro and micronutrient content) and analyzed. The results showed that 21,43%clay loamy, 16,67% sandy clay loam, 61,90% clay textureof the study area, respectively. Most of the soil pH measurements in the area fell between6,47-8,50 notral and slightly alkaline reactions. Soil organic matter content was deficient in all the region’s soils and approximately half of the soils were classed as saline soils. Deficiency of nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, iron, zinc, and cupper was determined in 55.65, 35.86, 39.63, 29.24, 43.4, and 2.8 % of the soils, respectively. The analysis also showed a total soil Nitrogen (N) content and plant available nutrients (Calcium Ca. Magnesium Mg and Potassium. K) concentrations of soil samples in adequate proportions. Plant available nutrients such as Iron (Fe) and Cupper (Cu) were at suffecient levels. Also Lead (Pb). Nicel (Ni) and Cadmium (Cd) were not at toxic levels in plant and soil samples. Plant available nutrient such as Manganes (Mn), Zinc (Zn), Boron (B) was low in soils sampled from Pasinler town agriculture soils. Plant available P content is insufficient in plant leaf samples. As a result of this. potato plant leaves grown on PasinlerPlain soils recorded insufficient levels of Phosphorus ,boron, manganese and Zinc .The results indicates that growers should make an attempt to conserve and improve the current fertility status of the soils.
[1] BakırcıoÄŸlu, D.,2009.Toprakta Makro ve Mikro Element Tayini. Trakya Üniversitesi Doktora tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Edirne.
[2] Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney C.S., 1982. Nitrogen Total. Methods of Soil Analysis Part2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronamy. No: 9 Part 2. Edition P: 597-622.
[3] DüzgüneÅŸ, O., Kesici T., Kavuncu O. ve Gürbüz F., 1987. AraÅŸtırma ve Deneme Metotları (Ä°statistik Metotları-II). Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 1021, 381 s, Ankara. FAO, 1990. Micronutrient. Assessment at the Country Leaves an Ä°nternational Study. FAO Soils Bulletion 63. Rome.
[4] GüneÅŸ, A., Alparslan M. ve Ä°nal, A., 1998. Critical Nutrient Concentrations and Antagonistic Synergistic Relationships Among the Nutrients of NFT Grown Young Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) Plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 21:2035-2047.
[5] Jackson, M. L., 1962. Soil Chemical Analysis. PrenticeHall. Inc. Cliffs, USA.
[6] Kacar, B., Taban S., Alpaslan M. ve Fuleky G., 1998. ZinePhosphorus Relationship in the Dry Matter Yield and the Uptake of Zn, P, Fe and Mn of Rice Plants (Oryza sativa L.) as Affeeted by the Total Carbonate Content of the Soil. Second International Zinc Symposium. Abstracts, pp, 20. October 2-3, 1998, Ankara-Turkey
[7] Kacar, B. ve Katkat V. A., 2007. Bitki Besleme. Nobel Yayınları. ISBN:978-975-591-834-1. 559.
[8] Lindsay, W.L. and Norwell W.A., 1969. Development of DTPA Soil Test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese and Copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. Vol: 33, 49-54.
[9] Mahler, R.L., 2010. Boron in Idaho. In. Essential Nutrients. College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extation Systems, CIS 1085
[10] Marschner, H., 1997. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd Edition. Academic Press, London 889 p. McLean, E.O., 1982. Soil pH and Lime Requirement. Methods of Soil Analysis Part2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronamy. No: 9 Part 2. Edition 199-224.
[11] Mengel, K., and Kirkby E.A., 1982. Principles of Plant Nutrition. 3th ed. International Potash Institute. P.O. Box. CH3048, pp 655, Worblaufen-Bern, Switzerland.
[12] Mertens, D. 2005. AOAC Official Method 975. 03. Metal in Plants and Pet Foods. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edn. Horwitz, W., and G. W. Latimer, (Eds). Chapter 3,pp 3-4, AOAC-İnternational Suite500,481. North Frederick Avenue, Gaitherburg, Maryland 20877-2417, USA. Parlak, M., Fidan, A. Kızılcık İ. ve Koparan
[13] H., 2008. Eceabat Ä°lçesi (Çanakkale) TarımTopraklarının Verimlilik Durumlarının Belirlenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 14 (4) 394-400.
[14] Taban, S., Alpaslan M., Hasemi A.G. ve
[15] Eken D. 1997. Orta Anadolu’da Çeltik Tarımı Yapılan Toprakların Bazı Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Özellikleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendistik Fakültesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 3(3): 457-466.
[16] Tovep, 1991. Türkiye toprakları Verimlilik Envanteri. T.C Tarım Orman ve Köy Ä°ÅŸleri Bakanlığı Köy Hizmetleri Genel MüdürlüÄŸü, Ankara.
[17] Tugay, M. E., CoÅŸkun A.Åž. ve Yılmaz G., 1999. Azotlu Gübre Miktarı ve Verme Zamanlarının Patateste Verim ve Bazı Özellikler Üzerine Etkileri. 2. Ulusal Patates Kongresi28-30 Haziran 1999 G O Ü. Zir Fak., 655-658, Samsun.
[18] Turan, M. A., Katkat A. V., Özsoy G. ve Taban S.,2010. Bursa Ä°li Alüviyal Tarım Topraklarının Verimlilik Durumları ve Potansiyel Beslenme Sorunlarının Belirlenmesi. U. Ü. Ziraat fakültesi dergisi (Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University), Cilt 24, Sayı 1, 115-130.
[19] Udo, E.J., Bohn H.L. and Tucker T.C. 1970. Zinc Adsorption by Calcareous Soils. Soil Sci.Soc. Am. J., 34: 405- 410. Yakıt, S. ve Tuna L., 2006. Tuz Stresi Altındaki Mısır Bitkisinde (Zea Mays L.) Stres Parametreleri Üzerine Ca, Mg Ve K’nın Etkileri Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2006, 19(1), 59-67.
[20] Yıldız, N., 2012. Bitki Beslemenin Esasları ve Bitkilerde Beslenme Bozukluğu Belirtileri. ISBN 978-605-62759-0-6, 1- 477. Erzurum
Vocational Training School, Ibrahim Çeçen University, Agrı,Turkey.
No. of Downloads: 8 | No. of Views: 812
Nesrin YILDIZ , Tülay DİZİKISA .
May 2016 - Vol 3, Issue 3