Mutation Analysis and Deviants with UML-HAZOP

Manoj Kumar

Abstract

The development of framework for safety critical area, when some an area of a system deviates from the intentions of designer could even be a critical research issue. We apply, HAZOP technique using UML, then, we check the object-oriented design with a faultfree analysis and style. By mutation analysis and HAZOP, we discover a far better optimum result. The mutation method could even be a fault-based testing strategy that measures the quality/adequacy of testing by examining whether the test set (test input data) utilized in testing can reveal certain sorts of faults. This paper describes the UML-HAZOP technique with mutation based operator or analysis. Using this, we discover more and more optimum result and solution, once we design our system with UML.

Keywords

Mutation Analysis, Mutation Testing, UML-HAZOP, ObjectOriented.

References

[1] S. Kim, J. A. Clark & J. A. McDermid, “Class Mutation: Mutation Testing for Object - Oriented Programs”, in Net. Object Days Conference on Object - Oriented Software Systems, 2000.

[2] J. H. Andrews, L .C. Briand and Y. Labiche, “Is Mutation An Appropriate Tool for Testing Experiments”,Proceeding 27th nternational Conference on Software Engineering, St Louis, USA, 2005, pp. 402-411.

[3] R. T. Alexander, J. M. Bieman, S. Ghosh, Bixia Ji, “Mutation of Java bjects”, To appear in Proc. IEEE International Symposium Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), 2002.

[4] C. K. Roy, J. R. Cordy, “Towards a Mutation -Based Automatic Framework for Evaluating Code Clone Detection Tools”, ACM nternational Conference Proc. Series, Volume: 273, Publisher: ACM Press, pp 137-140, 2008.

[5] P. Chevalley, P. Th´evenod-Fosse, “A Mutation Analysis Tool for Java Programs”, International Journal Software Tools Technology Transfer , 2003.

[6] S. Kim, J. A. Clark, and J. A. McDermid, “The Rigorous Generation of Java Mutation Operators Using HAZOP”, In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Software and Systems Engineering and their Applications (ICSSEA’ 99), Paris, France, Dec-1999.

[7] J. Górski, A. JarzÄ™bowicz, “Detecting Defects in Object - Oriented Diagrams Using UML - HAZOP”, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2002.

[8] J. Górski , A. JarzÄ™bowicz, “Development & Validation of a HAZOP Based Inspection of UML Models”, 3 rd World Congress for Software Quality 26-30 Sep- 2005,

[9] M. Rausand, ”HAZOP Hazard and Operability Study”, System Reliability Theory (2nd ed), Wiley, pp. 1- 44. 2004.

[10] Ministry of Defense, “HAZOP Studies on Systems Containing rogrammable Electronics”, Defense Standard 00-58, Parts 1 and 2, Issue 2, May 2000.

[11] A JarzÄ™bowicz and J Górski, ”Experimental Comparison of UML- HAZOP Inspection & Non – Structured Review”, Found. of Computing and Decision Sciences, Vol. 30. No. 1, pp. 29-38, 2005.

[12] Dinh -Trong, S. Ghosh, R. France, B. Baudry, and F. Fleurey. "A Taxonomy of Faults for UML Designs", In Proceedings of MoDeVa'05 (Model Design and Validation Workshop associated to MoDELS'05), Montego Bay, Jamaica, October 2005.

[13] S. B. A. Punuganti, P. k. Pattanaik, S. Prasad, R. Mall, “Model-Based Mutation Testing of Object-Oriented Programs”, Proceedings of 2nd nternational Conference on IT & Business Intelligence (ITBI-10), Nagpur, INDIA, November12–14, 2010.

Cites this article as

M. K. "Mutation Analysis and Deviants with UML-HAZOP", International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIREM), Vol-6, Issue-6, Page No-50-56, 2019. Available from:

Corresponding Author

Manoj Kumar

Senior Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Applications, International Institute for Special Education, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India (e-mail: iisemanoj@gmail.com)